You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Definitely not in a rush since 3D cell segmentations are still uncommon. But the ones I have seen have 2D segmentations in a z-stack which are evenly spaced. There are actually Simple Feature geometries for 3D solid bodies, like polyhedron, I really don't want to deal with polyhedrons since it's really confusing to specify the coordinates. I think I can use MULTIPOLYGONs to represent the multiple z-planes. Then create a new S3 class inheriting from sf to have a field specifying the z spacing. This way geometric operations can still be performed, though only in x and y, but I think that should be good enough for quite a while since thick sections (not serial sections) are still uncommon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Definitely not in a rush since 3D cell segmentations are still uncommon. But the ones I have seen have 2D segmentations in a z-stack which are evenly spaced. There are actually Simple Feature geometries for 3D solid bodies, like polyhedron, I really don't want to deal with polyhedrons since it's really confusing to specify the coordinates. I think I can use MULTIPOLYGONs to represent the multiple z-planes. Then create a new S3 class inheriting from
sf
to have a field specifying the z spacing. This way geometric operations can still be performed, though only in x and y, but I think that should be good enough for quite a while since thick sections (not serial sections) are still uncommon.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: