You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But even by creating the volume manually before running the image, or letting Docker create it upon image run, folders inside the volume are created, though no published package is present, the storage folder is empty.
The publishing is successful, as I see the package in the web UI.
I'd like not to have three separate volumes, is that possible?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
The Docker installation documentation say to bindmount three paths, then suggests using volumes.
I tried setting a single volume:
docker run -d -it --volume verdaccio-data:/verdaccio --name verdaccio -p 4873:4873 verdaccio/verdaccio
But even by creating the volume manually before running the image, or letting Docker create it upon image run, folders inside the volume are created, though no published package is present, the
storage
folder is empty.The publishing is successful, as I see the package in the web UI.
I'd like not to have three separate volumes, is that possible?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions