Replies: 1 comment
-
One additional idea that might be adaptable in some way is the recent approach KDE Plasma took by utilizing a notification popup that occurs only 1 time per year regarding donating to the project. While I don't suggest Revolt use a "popup" specifically, what I'm pointing out is the built-in (integration) of a donation "thingie" which REQUIRES some level of user interaction even if it's to dismiss the notification. This announcement from the KDE Plasma team was met with mixed opinions (quite emphatic and passionate btw) and turned out to be a HUGE success for KDE Plasma. This illustrates what I think is an acceptable, reverent and respectful approach to mandate the user's direct engagement on the topic of donating (even if it's to click "dismiss") without being a "Sheldon knocking on your door and calling your name incessantly until you answer". By limiting the "Sheldon" shenanigans to only once per year, that doesn't compromise user-base retention, and is brilliantly effective if KDE Plasma's results are anything to go by. :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I can't take credit for the entirety of the content in this post save for the time I spent posing the questions and sharing them here. I had a chat with Grok AI about strategies for Revolt's growth, specifically on what kind of donation levels might make a meaningful impact for Revolt (i.e. give it a little more gas and punch!). Then followed up with discussing relevant strategies for accomplishing exactly that. I hope this helps.
I'm not a dev and I'm poor, but I also know a lot about tech and of the demographics that are exploited and preyed upon the most year over year (most of us think it's granny getting scam calls from overseas) it's actually gamers. Gamers need Revolt to rival the options they currently (and obliviously, I'd argue) leverage to try and enjoy doing what they do with friends/family/etc. I don't infer that these closed-source, for-profit platforms need to be "run out of business" or anything. The problem is (and I'd argue always is in just about anything) choice or the lack thereof. The vulnerable need to have the ability to choose something that's meaningfully different at a fundamental level. (In this case, open-source vs. closed-source).
That concludes my preface. Much love to all. I hope this is useful, or at the very least intriguing. ;)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions