References in ISO docs (both normative and informative) #7
-
I am working on an ISO document and am unsure the correct way to reference something that is not from the usual groups that typically get referenced. The first one I have is a reference to OpenGL 4.2 (in my normative reference list). When I mark it up like this:
It appears in the the document like: OPENGL42, The OpenGL Graphics System, A Specification, Version 4.1 (Core Profile), July 25, 2010 Ideally the "OPENGL42" would not show up in the document. Any suggestions of how to properly cite OpenGL? My second challenge is in the bibliography (informative) and is a reference to a journal article from 1952. I marked it up like:
It appears in the document like: [7] HUFFMAN D.A. “A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes“, Proceedings of the I.R.E., vol. 40, iss. 9, September 1952, pp. 1098-1101 That is more or less like I would expect it to show up (after I found out the entries will get renumbered as needed), but I want to confirm that I am marking up the citation correctly and not doing tag abuse. Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
Metanorma/Relaton does not (yet) support Khronos standards so they need to be encoded manually: (This is for OpenGL 4.2, not 4.1, since that's what was mentioned)
For the second:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@stuartgalt for the second, you can actually just use the DOI. This paper can be found on IEEE via Google: Which gives you a DOI. Luckily the IEEE DOIs have data published at CrossRef so we can obtain the bib info. You can use the DOI to cite it, which saves a ton of time:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@stuartgalt for the second, you can actually just use the DOI. This paper can be found on IEEE via Google:
Which gives you a DOI. Luckily the IEEE DOIs have data published at CrossRef so we can obtain the bib info.
You can use the DOI to cite it, which saves a ton of time: