Skip to content

Failed upgrade may lead to an endless loop of rollbacks #224

Open
@kovayur

Description

@kovayur

Problem

When the reconciler fails to upgrade the release it rollbacks to the previous revision and returns an error. The controller runtime is expected to retry the reconciliation with an exponential backoff, but in reality it keeps reconciling over and over again. I was able to reproduce this behavior for the following use cases:

  1. Lack of the PATCH permission for the operator service account to update the K8S object.
  2. Error in the YAML structure caused by a bug in the chart or incorrect values. Example: an env variable in Deployment is set by both value and valueFrom tags (ROX-18477: operator delete valuesFrom in proxy config if values is set stackrox/stackrox#7105).
  3. CRD used in the release has been removed from the cluster.

Every rollback increases the revision count. In my case, the operator spawns thousands of revisions in a matter of minutes.

Root cause

A rolled back revision is no different from the upgraded revision, it has the deployed status as after a normal upgrade. There always be a diff between the expected state calculated from the CR and the rolled back revision this will lead to a failed upgrade again and again.

There're events that are added in the reconciliation queue aside of the exponential backoff and cause the reconciliation without any delay. These events are:

  1. CR status is updated on every reconcile. This is because Irreconcilable status is updated twice for every reconcile both with False (right before the upgrade) and True (after the upgrade failed).
  2. A failed upgrade and subsequent rollback causes multiple changes in the secrets storage which are watched and each adds an item the reconciliation queue. Let's say that revision 1 was successful, revision 2 is problematic, revision 3 - is the rollback to revision 1. Upon upgrading to version 2 the following events will be triggered:
    1. Create revision 2 with status pending-upgrade
    2. Mark revision 2 as failed
    3. Create revision 3 with status pending-rollback
    4. Mark revision 1 as superseded
    5. Mark revision 3 as deployed or failed depending on the rollback result.

There is deduplication in the queue, but still at least one event will be queued without delay.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions