-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[New Feature]: Clarification on running workflow locally #216
Comments
@scottyhq - I don't know anything about this repository... I heard about this issue ticket via @alhandwerger. I have created workflows for other OPERA packages to generate the products locally. They are not pretty or elegant. Most are WIP. https://github.com/OPERA-Cal-Val/dswx-hls-pst-workflow/blob/dev/0-Run-DSWX-HLS.ipynb Basically, I have created software to pull data from various aws public buckets and stitch the tiles together including: https://github.com/ACCESS-Cloud-Based-InSAR/dem-stitcher I don't know about the TEC data. I have never created the official burst database... Know this is the relevant software: https://github.com/opera-adt/burst_db Btw - I use your gists like once a month or more. Last week - I used this to help write a proposal. We still don't have historical OPERA RTC data either :( |
Thanks for the pointers @cmarshak! With @scottstanie 's updates to the opera-db repository I'm now able to run For
You can get the needed TEC file for the above example from NASA CDDIS Finally, for the dem, I've just used With all the auxiliary files now specified, the workflow completes and the file structure is as expected but the array values do not quite match the standard product. linear amplitude difference plotted below along with the full log I did notice the log reports full log
|
Hey Scott, Two Scott's are better than one. Especially two highly capable ones! In regards to the error, my best guess is gdal incompatibility with the minor version Happy adventures! |
You're right that the DEM could be different:
As far as the Just checking- you have |
Thanks both for the follow up! It seems like a mismatch of DEM is the primary suspect for different outputs currently, so it would be great to get clarity on the DEM used for standard products from whoever is familiar with it.
Interesting, I've not yet heard of NISAR DEM... It would be great to document how it was updated, or even better just make the
Just very small differences in the output above, as expected
Yes, I just copied the config file from the
|
Hi @scottyhq, OPERA and ASFDAAC are in conversation to make the ancillaries available where possible (depends on licensing), or provide instructions where to find them, or instructions to re-create them. We will need to walk through the process and keep you posted once it's completed. |
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
Alternatives considered
Yes - and alternatives don't suffice
Related problems
Thanks for making this code public! We're interested in creating CLSCs at different global locations back to 2014.
As a test I tried to recreate this file from ASF locally:
OPERA_L2_CSLC-S1_T013-026571-IW1_20231007T142223Z_20231009T193106Z_S1A_VV_v1.0.h5
Each HDF contains its own runconfig, but the paths to ancillary data are hardcoded and it's not clear how to get those files in place :
Describe the feature request
Add documentation on full process of creating a CSLC, in particular how to get ancillary files:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: