What is the reason to ignore zfs_arc_max when it's set equal to zfs_arc_min explisetly #11676
Unanswered
matveevandrey
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Before ZFS 2.0 setting zfs_arc_min = zfs_arc_max did hard limit usage of ARC with corresponding values
But now setting these 2 values equal gives the result as folllowing:
Upper limit is ignored and set to half of RAM memory.
Well, setting "zfs_arc_min" to 103079215103 does solve the issue but what is the reason behind?
Specially if it breaks compatibility (old behavior) with no good reason
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions