-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support JWS JSON Serialization #242
Comments
There are two kinds of serialization, flatten and general. I was thinking about adding the converting function between:
What do you think about it? @cre8 |
That does not make so much sense: I started the implementation that you pass the issuance function a value what kind of type do you want and the return value is based on this. Then we need to update the decode function and verify so the three options can be consumed. The default one should be compact to not break any existing implementations |
Yeah, you're right. A generalised Json serialisation can have multiple signatures. So there is a possibility that it cannot be converted to a compact one. I think it's better to approach it the way you said. :) |
I have implemented it for the issuance, but decoding and tests are missing. Maybe I am able to create a pr until Friday |
To prevent too many changes to the internal implementation, I'm considering creating a new class for JWS JSON-related functions. |
I don't think that is possible, see my current PR. The jwt object needs to hold multiple signatures, so we need to touch some of the core classes |
In sd-jwt draft 09 section 9, JSON Serialization method is added. Let's support this feature in our library
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: