-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] missing definition in termsQuery #540
Comments
[Triage]
The Thank you |
I would introduce a Either way start by writing a test that exercises this API and then the schema. |
Sure, I will raise a PR adding some tests to Ref: |
+1 |
Seems like the Search API has a lot of holes to patch. This one is related: #529 I'll look into the old ES spec (right before OS was forked) to see what's missing and cross check with the new features of this API that are unique to OS. |
Yes, please. Closing this one. |
why we use different definition from #540 (comment) in the PR. I did quick testing on
the JSON will be as below, which looks correct.
however with what defined in PR, here
the JSON will be missing <field_name> |
@amberzsy @prudhvigodithi I've just made a fix to correct the position of the |
What is the bug?
termsQuery has Object without properties defined
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: