Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional interface functions for edition-engraver #142

Open
uliska opened this issue Dec 17, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Additional interface functions for edition-engraver #142

uliska opened this issue Dec 17, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@uliska
Copy link
Contributor

uliska commented Dec 17, 2015

There are so many instances where you'll use \editionMod ... \once \override ... so I think we should add new functions for this kind of use case. Something like

\eeOOverride fullscore 13 0/4 TextScript.Y-Offset 5

which will internally translate to

\editionMod fullscore 13 0/4 \once \override TextScript.Y-Offset = 5

This approach would also make it possible to automatically add a conditional coloring based on the state of, say \getOption default.draft.


Additionally I think of things like

\eeOverrideFor fullscore 13 0/4 4*17 TextScript.color #red

=>

\editionMod fullscore 13 0/4 \temporary \override TextScript.color = #red
\editionMod fullscore #(add-duration 13 0/4 4*17) \revert TextScript.color

Of course the existing functions should be kept to allow arbitrary music expressions to be applied. But there could be more use cases for other specialized interface functions.

I think things like these shouldn't be hard to implement, the most complicated thing probably being the naming ;-)


However, I'm thinking if it wouldn't be a good idea not to improve the edition-engraver and then move it into a new-style library. There have now been multiple experiences with the tool, ideas for subtle and substantial improvements, and a completely new use case. Maybe it's time for a restart, collaboratively creating that new library from scratch and simply leaving the current tool as it is.
This should go along with a new ID based approach.

@jpvoigt @kierenmacmillan ideas? opinions?

@kierenmacmillan
Copy link

Hi Urs,

Maybe it's time for a restart, collaboratively creating that new library from scratch and simply leaving the current tool as it is. This should go along with a new ID based approach

@jpvoigt @kierenmacmillan ideas? opinions?

I think we shouldn’t rule out a from-scratch approach.
Regardless, I’ve got a wealth of experience (several years and dozens of scores) from which I can speak to this.

Cheers,
Kieren.


Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: [email protected]

@uliska
Copy link
Contributor Author

uliska commented Dec 17, 2015

Maybe you could start speaking (aside and maybe privately) to me with hints on how the edition-engraver can successfully interact with multiple bookparts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants