-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: sbi reloaded: a toolkit for simulation-based inference workflows #7428
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
|
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: swyft: Truncated Marginal Neural Ratio Estimation in Python BayesFlow: Amortized Bayesian Workflows With Neural Networks BlackBIRDS: Black-Box Inference foR Differentiable Simulators PyVBMC: Efficient Bayesian inference in Python Fast and flexible simulation and parameter estimation for synthetic biology using bioscrape |
@janfb - could you clarify here what parts of this new version are novel when compared to your last published version? Thank you. |
Hi @crvernon , thanks a lot for starting this process. Yes of course. There are lots of new features and general changes to the package. We implemented several new SBI algorithms, new validation methods and more plotting tools, and provided access to the widely-used sampling libraries for posterior sampling and visualization (pyro, pymc, arviz). We also added many more tutorials, revised the entire documentation website, and improved the package maintenance pipelines. In the paper, we added a figure to give an overview of the new features: ![]() In lines 71-78 in the draft PDF, we also give a summary of what changed compared to the last published version. Please let me know, if you need further clarification. |
List of potential reviewers:
|
Thank you @janfb |
@editorialbot invite @boisgera as editor 👋 @boisgera can you take this one on as editor? Thanks! |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot assign @boisgera as editor |
Assigned! @boisgera is now the editor |
For the record, I have contacted a few researchers of my University that could review this project. I'll give them ~1 week to tell me if they can do it and if needed I'll reach out for another set of potential reviewers. See you soon! |
Hi @janfb, I wish you a happy new year! I am sorry for the delay here, I have been far too busy to handle JOSS matters properly at the end of 2024. Let me tell you where we stand: I have received a majority of "no" and a few "maybe but later" to my first batch of proposals to review your project (nothing suprising unfortunately, and not connected at all with the quality of your submission!). I am contacting again the "maybes" and opening the proposal to a few other potential reviewers. I hope that we'll be ready to start the review soon! Best regards, Sébastien |
Hi @boisgera , thanks for the update here! And thanks for your efforts for finding reviewers. Best, |
@editorialbot add @arnauqb as reviewer |
@arnauqb added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @francois-rozet as reviewer |
@francois-rozet added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7754. |
Submitting author: @janfb (Jan Boelts)
Repository: https://github.com/sbi-dev/sbi
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-submission-2024
Version: v0.23.2
Editor: @boisgera
Reviewers: @arnauqb, @francois-rozet
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @janfb. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@janfb if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: