-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: movement_primitives: Imitation Learning of Cartesian Motion with Movement Primitives #6530
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🟡 License found: |
|
@AlexanderFabisch - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy. For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience! |
👋 @ymzayek - would you be willing to edit this submission? |
@editorialbot invite @ymzayek as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@crvernon Yes I can take this one |
Great, thanks @ymzayek! |
@editorialbot assign @ymzayek as editor |
Assigned! @ymzayek is now the editor |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Hi @AlexanderFabisch, thank you for submitting your work to JOSS. I am the handling editor. Do you have any suggestion for reviewers? You can use the potential reviewers list provided at the top of this issue. I think people interested in robotics and Python would be a good fit. If you have suggestions, please provide a list of potential reviewers here but do not use the @ character to avoid receiving unwanted notifications. Thank you in advance. |
@AlexanderFabisch it seems there are also some missing and invalid DOIs per this comment above. Would you be able to update these? |
Hi @ymzayek, thanks for handling this submission.
I looked for expertise in Python, robotics, and machine learning. None of the listed reviewers seems to be an expert in this specific field (which is rather small). So the following reviewers seem to be good candidates (without any preferences):
I checked all of the references and they really seem to have no DOIs:
JMLR generally does not seem to have DOIs
Same for NeurIPS
This was put on arxiv before they started to assign DOIs automatically
This is not a real publication, but a software The invalid DOI should already be fixed with the latest commit on the branch that contains the paper: dfki-ric/movement_primitives@89771fb (PR). |
@editorialbot check references |
|
Hello @mhubii, @gautam-sharma1 and @ishaanamahajan, Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)? JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: movement_primitives: Imitation Learning of Cartesian Motion with Movement Primitives You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (#6530). The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know. This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer. Thank you in advance! |
Yes, I am happy to assist. Please let me know how I should move forward. |
Hello Yasmin,
Yes, I would be willing to review this article.
Thanks,
Gautam Sharma
…_______________________________
Software Engineer
Natick, MA
*+1 480-937-7152 | ***@***.*** ***@***.***>
| www.sharmagautam.com <http://www.sharmagautam.com>*
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 3:30 AM Yasmin ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello @mhubii <https://github.com/mhubii>, @gautam-sharma1
<https://github.com/gautam-sharma1> and @ishaanamahajan
<https://github.com/ishaanamahajan>,
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS
(Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The
submission I'd like you to review is titled:
#6530 <#6530>
You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (#6530
<#6530>).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is
open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have
any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will
start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will
be 23 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6530 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANFJZTYCGOTNGEEFKBJ2ARDY7XZJLAVCNFSM6AAAAABFDYILU6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBSGA2TKNBYGM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@editorialbot add @ishaanamahajan as reviewer |
@ishaanamahajan added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @gautam-sharma1 as reviewer |
@gautam-sharma1 added to the reviewers list! |
Thanks @gautam-sharma1 and @ishaanamahajan for agreeing to review this paper. The review will start in a separate thread. @AlexanderFabisch you can follow the review in the review issue that will be opened. |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #6695. |
Submitting author: @AlexanderFabisch (Alexander Fabisch)
Repository: https://github.com/dfki-ric/movement_primitives/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: 0.7.0
Editor: @ymzayek
Reviewers: @ishaanamahajan, @gautam-sharma1
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AlexanderFabisch. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@AlexanderFabisch if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: