We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi there!
I've detected a bug in CVFPU.
A conversion of +inf from double to simple sets a lot of bits in the mantissa, unexpectedly. I have found it through cva6.
Here is an example RISC-V (rv64imfd) snippet:
.section ".text.init","ax",@progbits .globl _start .align 2 _start: # Enable the FPU li t0, 0x2000 csrs mstatus, t0 csrw fcsr,x0 la t0, .fdata0 fld ft0, (t0) fcvt.s.d ft1, ft0, rdn li t0, 0x18 fsd ft1, (t0) sw x0, 0(x0) infinite_loop: j infinite_loop .section ".fdata0","ax",@progbits .8byte 0x7ff0000000000000
We expect ft1= 0xffffffff7f800000.. I verified this with Spike. However, CVA6 gives ft1= 0xffffffff7f7fffff..
ft1= 0xffffffff7f800000.
ft1= 0xffffffff7f7fffff.
Thanks! Flavien
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi there!
I've detected a bug in CVFPU.
Brief bug description
A conversion of +inf from double to simple sets a lot of bits in the mantissa, unexpectedly.
I have found it through cva6.
Example instance
Here is an example RISC-V (rv64imfd) snippet:
Expected and actual results
We expect
ft1= 0xffffffff7f800000.
. I verified this with Spike.However, CVA6 gives
ft1= 0xffffffff7f7fffff.
.Thanks!
Flavien
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: