chore: v6.7.0 version bump

[pomegranited]

TL;DR - Prepare release version

What changed?

• version now v6.7.0

Developer Checklist

• Reviewed the release process
• Translations and JS/SASS compiled
• Bumped version number in openassessment/__init__.py and package.json

Reviewer Checklist

Collectively, these should be completed by reviewers of this PR:

• I've done a visual code review
• I've tested the new functionality

FYI: @openedx/content-aurora

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @pomegranited! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.05%. Comparing base (43ae22a) to head (f28058e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2208   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.05%   95.05%           
=======================================
  Files         191      191           
  Lines       21098    21098           
  Branches     1904     1904           
=======================================
  Hits        20055    20055           
  Misses        779      779           
  Partials      264      264           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	95.05% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pomegranited]

Hi @mphilbrick211 @openedx/content-aurora

Could somebody help me out with this version bump by approving here and creating a new release? Sorry to ask, but I'm going on leave tomorrow, and we're trying to get these updates into Redwood, which is cutting soon.

Thanks!

[mphilbrick211]

Hi @pomegranited! I don't think Aurora is reviewing pull requests, but let me look into this.

[leangseu-edx]

@pomegranited 6.7.0 had already been release. https://github.com/openedx/edx-ora2/releases/tag/6.7.0

Do you think this pr is still needed?

[itsjeyd]

@mphilbrick211

I don't think Aurora is reviewing pull requests, ...

Per https://github.com/openedx/edx-ora2/blob/master/catalog-info.yaml#L16, Aurora maintains this repo. The file was created last month (by @jristau1984), so the info that it contains is probably up-to-date?

The main thing that's changed for this repo, I think, is that we should be pinging the Aurora team via @openedx/2u-aurora, and stop using the legacy @openedx/content-aurora handle.

Also, it's possible that the settings for this repo need some additional updates -- I tried requesting a review from @openedx/2u-aurora and it didn't work (auto-complete didn't turn up any results).

[openedx-webhooks]

@pomegranited Even though your pull request wasn’t merged, please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.

[pomegranited]

@leangseu-edx

6.7.0 had already been release. https://github.com/openedx/edx-ora2/releases/tag/6.7.0 Do you think this pr is still needed?

Oh good, yep, that's all I needed. Thank you!

@itsjeyd @mphilbrick211

The main thing that's changed for this repo, I think, is that we should be pinging the Aurora team via @openedx/2u-aurora, and stop using the legacy @openedx/content-aurora handle.

Noted, thank you :)

Also, it's possible that the settings for this repo need some additional updates -- I tried requesting a review from @openedx/2u-aurora and it didn't work (auto-complete didn't turn up any results).

I'm able to use the 2u handle ok? Not sure why it doesn't work for you.

[itsjeyd]

@pomegranited It works for me when I try to use it in a comment, but not in the context of the reviewers field:

(The screenshot doesn't show it but I also tried openedx/2u-aurora 😅)

Is it working everywhere for you?

[pomegranited]

@itsjeyd Ah.. no, I can't request a review from 2u-aurora either. From github's docs:

Organization members with write access can also assign a pull request review to any person or team with read access to a repository.

Maybe 2u-aurora doesn't have read access to this repo? I'm unable to see the repo settings, so can't find out for myself.

@mphilbrick211 can you help?

[mphilbrick211]

@pomegranited @itsjeyd I'm going to check on this, as I'm not sure Aurora is still reviewing. If they are, I'll confirm if they need access.

[jristau1984]

@mphilbrick211 yes, 2u-aurora needs to be added to this repo.