Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add MPLS-in-UDP and GUE decapsulation actions to policy-forwarding rules #528

Open
danameme opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@danameme
Copy link
Contributor

Add MPLS-in-UDP and GUE decapsulation actions to policy-forwarding/openconfig-pf-forwarding-policies.yang

  1. MPLS-in-UDP [RFC 7510]
  2. Generic UDP Encapsulation (GUE) [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-gue/]
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 180 days with no activity. If you wish to keep this issue active, please remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise will be closed in 14 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 22, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 19, 2024
@dplore
Copy link
Member

dplore commented Jul 19, 2024

FYI: this is getting added here for afts and use in gRIBI:
#1153

Not exactly the same use case as static config though.

@robshakir robshakir reopened this Aug 8, 2024
@robshakir
Copy link
Contributor

I suspect we actually need this configuration to ensure that UDP decapsulation can be covered. I'll re-open this issue to keep it tracked -- especially with overlap with #1153.

@dplore
Copy link
Member

dplore commented Aug 8, 2024

This issue is similar, but different. It requests using policyforwarding, whereas #1153 only has AFT in scope.

Note, https://github.com/openconfig/featureprofiles/pull/3363/files#diff-a6b35105c1accdb1889d9c529f4a13d6844d4a9844a90f3d3f736eba728502c5R304 has a nascent proposal for decap using AFT which could use a review.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Aug 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants