You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the GNMI Path: /openconfig-bfd:bfd/interfaces/interface/peers, the state container contains an attribute “failure-transitions” that tracks the number of times that the BFD session has transitioned out of the UP state. In the echo and async sub-containers, there is an attribute for “up-transitions”, which tracks the number of times that the adjacency with the neighbor has transitioned into the UP state." I would like some clarification as to why the failure-transitions are tracked as one attribute in the state container, while there are 2 attributes tracking up-transitions, one for echo and the other for async.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think these leaves are relevant as I think the session state would be reported at the /bfd/interfaces/interface/peers/peer/state container and not within the mode container?
In the GNMI Path: /openconfig-bfd:bfd/interfaces/interface/peers, the state container contains an attribute “failure-transitions” that tracks the number of times that the BFD session has transitioned out of the UP state. In the echo and async sub-containers, there is an attribute for “up-transitions”, which tracks the number of times that the adjacency with the neighbor has transitioned into the UP state." I would like some clarification as to why the failure-transitions are tracked as one attribute in the state container, while there are 2 attributes tracking up-transitions, one for echo and the other for async.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: