You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The active-path leaf of aps-module (openconfig-transport-line-protection) indicates if the active path is the primary path or the secondary path. But it is not possible to identify which port component is the primary or the secondary one.
So I’d like to propose adding a new state leaf to each port defined in aps-module that would be a reference to the related component of PORT type. Here below in yellow is the proposal for the new leaf for line-primary-in port:
Same proposal for the 5 other ports of aps-module:
• line-primary-out,
• line-secondary-in
• line-secondary-out
• common-in
• common-output.
This proposal only considers a state leaf because the primary and secondary paths are typically defined (fixed) by the internal model of the WDM equipment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The active-path leaf of aps-module (openconfig-transport-line-protection) indicates if the active path is the primary path or the secondary path. But it is not possible to identify which port component is the primary or the secondary one.
So I’d like to propose adding a new state leaf to each port defined in aps-module that would be a reference to the related component of PORT type. Here below in yellow is the proposal for the new leaf for line-primary-in port:
Same proposal for the 5 other ports of aps-module:
• line-primary-out,
• line-secondary-in
• line-secondary-out
• common-in
• common-output.
This proposal only considers a state leaf because the primary and secondary paths are typically defined (fixed) by the internal model of the WDM equipment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: