You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are other augmentations like traffic-class-mapping-profile included here to enable per flow QoS, but ignore for now,, we will create a thread in QoS.
Looking forward to getting your feedback. Thanks
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It looks like this might be something that overlaps with the reworked structure in #93 -- could you PTAL, it might allow you to remove the augment that you have specified.
we are using gribi and aft to forward 5G GTP-U packets, the data plane destination look-up sequence uses the following network header fields:
Using AFT model, each FT is logically separated and entry is added as oneof entry {...}; therefore grouping multiple FT as another FT is not feasible. The current implementation augments the gribi-aft.yang to support a gtp-u table as:
| +--ro afts
| | +--ro gtp-u
| | +--ro gtp-u-entry* [outer-ip-source outer-ip-destination teid]
| | +--ro outer-ip-source // -> ../state/outer-ip-source
| | +--ro outer-ip-destination // -> ../state/outer-ip-destination
| | +--ro teid // -> ../state/teid
| | +--ro state
| | | +--ro outer-ip-source? // -> ../../gtp-u-in-ip/state/outer-ip/ipv4/source-address
| | | +--ro outer-ip-destination? // -> ../../gtp-u-in-ip/state/outer-ip/ipv4/destination-address
| | | +--ro teid? // -> ../../gtp-u-in-ip/state/tunnel/teid
| | | +--ro traffic-class-mapping-profile? // -> ../../../../../../../qos/traffic-class-mapping-profiles/traffic-class-mapping-profile/config/name
| | | +--ro next-hop-group? // -> /oc-ni:network-instances/network-instance/afts/next-hop-groups/next-hop-group/state/id
| | | +--ro next-hop-group-network-instance? oc-ni:network-instance-ref
| | +--ro gtp-u-in-ip
| | | +--ro state
| | | +--ro l2
| | | | +--ro vlan? uint16
| | | +--ro outer-ip
| | | | +--ro ipv4
| | | | +--ro source-address? oc-inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | | +--ro destination-address? oc-inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | +--ro udp
| | | | +--ro port? oc-inet:port-number
| | | +--ro tunnel
| | | | +--ro teid? uint64
| | | | +--ro qfi? uint8
| | | +--ro inner-ip
| | | +--ro ip-address-set? ip-address-set. // enum for v4 or v6 ip
| | | +--ro ipv4
| | | | +--ro source-address? oc-inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | | +--ro destination-address? oc-inet:ipv4-prefix
| | | | +--ro dscp? oc-inet:dscp
| | | +--ro ipv6
| | | +--ro source-address? oc-inet:ipv6-prefix
| | | +--ro source-flow-label? oc-inet:ipv6-flow-label
| | | +--ro destination-address? oc-inet:ipv6-prefix
| | | +--ro destination-flow-label? oc-inet:ipv6-flow-label
| | | +--ro dscp? oc-inet:dscp
There are other augmentations like traffic-class-mapping-profile included here to enable per flow QoS, but ignore for now,, we will create a thread in QoS.
Looking forward to getting your feedback. Thanks
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: