You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! I am using LSL for recording my data from the OpenBCI. I am running using cmd command (--stream). It is supposed, based on open bci's documentation, that the sampling rate is 250hz by default. Running as in the example, I obtain this picture where the rate showed is 125hz:
Why is the sample rate divided by 2? When I remove this, my new setup in the cmd is:
Despite this change and set up the sample rate using the SDK into LSL (employing the command ~), the sample rate remains the same. For demonstrating it, I recorded the data (using labstreamlayer recorder) and opened the XDF file in Matlab I just realized that the effective sample rate remains 125hz, as Matlab highlights:
I also calculated the diff between time stamps and effectively I obtained 125hz (0.0080).
Can someone explain how I really can set up the sample rate for an effective sample rate (>250Hz) for recording through LSL.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! I am using LSL for recording my data from the OpenBCI. I am running using cmd command (--stream). It is supposed, based on open bci's documentation, that the sampling rate is 250hz by default. Running as in the example, I obtain this picture where the rate showed is 125hz:
I went into the code for trying to identify where this set up comes and I found this division:
https://github.com/OpenBCI/OpenBCI_LSL/blob/3134a1513c204834d66084491f104e6f236e440b/lib/open_bci_v3.py#L117
Why is the sample rate divided by 2? When I remove this, my new setup in the cmd is:
Despite this change and set up the sample rate using the SDK into LSL (employing the command ~), the sample rate remains the same. For demonstrating it, I recorded the data (using labstreamlayer recorder) and opened the XDF file in Matlab I just realized that the effective sample rate remains 125hz, as Matlab highlights:
I also calculated the diff between time stamps and effectively I obtained 125hz (0.0080).
Can someone explain how I really can set up the sample rate for an effective sample rate (>250Hz) for recording through LSL.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: