You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A user might have record packages to which they want to add compiled releases and/or versioned releases. With these as input, releases are already grouped by OCID. We can then skip the first phase of the merge function that groups releases by OCID.
We can already create a single record package from input record packages if we set --root-path records.item.releases.item, but we would lose package metadata and the individual packages. A new option/command is needed to preserve these.
If a release in a record is a linked release, we should error for now, given that requesting a remote release is an expensive operation.
Note: We can create a single record package from input individual records, using the command as-is (it'll be treated as a release package).
Similarly, if the user can already provide a list of release packages and/or individual releases such that releases with the same OCID are consecutive, they should be able to indicate this (e.g. with a --pre-grouped flag), and we can then skip the first phase of grouping releases by OCID.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jpmckinney
changed the title
Merge record packages, and stream ordered by OCID
Merge record packages, and merge stream ordered by OCID
Dec 31, 2019
jpmckinney
changed the title
Merge record packages, and merge stream ordered by OCID
compile: Merge record packages, and merge stream ordered by OCID
Dec 31, 2019
jpmckinney
changed the title
compile: Merge record packages, and merge stream ordered by OCID
compile: Merge record packages (and merge stream ordered by OCID)
Jan 2, 2020
jpmckinney
changed the title
compile: Merge record packages (and merge stream ordered by OCID)
Merge record packages (and merge stream ordered by OCID)
Jan 4, 2020
Follow-up to #83
A user might have record packages to which they want to add compiled releases and/or versioned releases. With these as input, releases are already grouped by OCID. We can then skip the first phase of the
merge
function that groups releases by OCID.We can already create a single record package from input record packages if we set
--root-path records.item.releases.item
, but we would lose package metadata and the individual packages. A new option/command is needed to preserve these.If a release in a record is a linked release, we should error for now, given that requesting a remote release is an expensive operation.
Note: We can create a single record package from input individual records, using the command as-is (it'll be treated as a release package).
Similarly, if the user can already provide a list of release packages and/or individual releases such that releases with the same OCID are consecutive, they should be able to indicate this (e.g. with a
--pre-grouped
flag), and we can then skip the first phase of grouping releases by OCID.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: