You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Gomega can be used with or without Ginkgo. Using BDD styled testing frameworks is a personal choice and i for one find it quite difficult to read test cases that are written in Ginkgo. I just prefer using standard golang native test framework along with a minimalist assertion library.
I was hoping to use gomega as it works also with go native tests but unfortunately i do not wish to pull in ginkgo as a dependency which i am forced to do as soon as i include gomega. I was really hoping that you would consider making the core assertion library as a separate go module which will be independent of ginkgo and then provide extensions for easy consumption in ginkgo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hey there - i’ve honestly tried real hard to make sure gomega doesn’t have a direct dependency on ginkgo and… as far as I know. it doesn’t! just a test dependency which i would have expected to come up as an indirect dependency. i’m honestly unsure why go mod thinks ginkgo is a required direct dependency. it really shouldn’t be (and really isn’t!)
Gomega can be used with or without Ginkgo. Using BDD styled testing frameworks is a personal choice and i for one find it quite difficult to read test cases that are written in Ginkgo. I just prefer using standard golang native test framework along with a minimalist assertion library.
I was hoping to use gomega as it works also with go native tests but unfortunately i do not wish to pull in ginkgo as a dependency which i am forced to do as soon as i include gomega. I was really hoping that you would consider making the core assertion library as a separate go module which will be independent of ginkgo and then provide extensions for easy consumption in ginkgo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: