You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! I'm trying to determine whether OKD is the right choice for what I'm trying to accomplish.
I have a small cluster of five identical nodes, which I'm trying to configure as a hyperconverged platform for hosting VMs, containers, and CEPH storage. I want to prepare a single read-only system image that I can deploy to the (redundant) internal SD storage in each node. I'm aware that some functionality will have unnecessary redundancy, since it's sufficient to have only two or three nodes for certain roles.
Most search results describe using read-only root inside containers, which is not what I'm trying to do. Can OKD itself run with a read-only root filesystem, where CEPH is the only persistent storage?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello! I'm trying to determine whether OKD is the right choice for what I'm trying to accomplish.
I have a small cluster of five identical nodes, which I'm trying to configure as a hyperconverged platform for hosting VMs, containers, and CEPH storage. I want to prepare a single read-only system image that I can deploy to the (redundant) internal SD storage in each node. I'm aware that some functionality will have unnecessary redundancy, since it's sufficient to have only two or three nodes for certain roles.
Most search results describe using read-only root inside containers, which is not what I'm trying to do. Can OKD itself run with a read-only root filesystem, where CEPH is the only persistent storage?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions