You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the Elo from SPRT is derived from equation 6.1 of this document: https://hardy.uhasselt.be/Fishtest/brownian_approximation.pdf. so basically the SPRT elo implemented in fishtest right now is caclulated using the results of the GSPRT. i have issues with this as a tester as the resulting elo can behave quite weirdly such as elo being negative when theres more wins than losses. It would be preffered if regular pentanomial elo thats independent of the SPRT bounds are shown to get an accurate representation of the tested engines strength such as those that are displayed in fixed tests. a solution to this is by displaying both elo with the GSPRT approximated elo being labeled as SPRT Elo or Adjusted Elo while the regular elo is labelled as just Elo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now the Elo from SPRT is derived from equation 6.1 of this document: https://hardy.uhasselt.be/Fishtest/brownian_approximation.pdf. so basically the SPRT elo implemented in fishtest right now is caclulated using the results of the GSPRT. i have issues with this as a tester as the resulting elo can behave quite weirdly such as elo being negative when theres more wins than losses. It would be preffered if regular pentanomial elo thats independent of the SPRT bounds are shown to get an accurate representation of the tested engines strength such as those that are displayed in fixed tests. a solution to this is by displaying both elo with the GSPRT approximated elo being labeled as SPRT Elo or Adjusted Elo while the regular elo is labelled as just Elo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: