Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emulate smoke / co virtual zone #69

Open
mcnutter1 opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

Emulate smoke / co virtual zone #69

mcnutter1 opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@mcnutter1
Copy link

When using the option to emulate a virtual zone (zone expander on Vista Panels) is there a way to send the appropriate signal for fire or co trouble? I have the zone type set to fire but it just says the smoke is offline, not that there is a fire signal when I open the Zone using L0481.

I would have posted this in the forum but no one ever approved my account.

@f34rdotcom
Copy link
Contributor

It should be L481 It is only a 2 digit zone for the relay command because relays must be from zone 9-48 to be on a zone expander.
Since you are using 48 I am assuming that expander #5 is enabled on the AD2*

No worries on the forums :( I have been getting slammed with spam bots so I may have missed your account. This is much better a place anyway IMHO.

Best
Sean M

@mcnutter1
Copy link
Author

My mistake on the extra number, it trips the zone but doesn’t send the fire code as a smoke alarm would… it sends a supervisory control as if the smoke has become disconnected…
Not something that triggers the alarm.

@f34rdotcom
Copy link
Contributor

Cool, maybe a feature. Lets find out. I can setup a test at my desk. Send me the zone config using a terminal / putty to the AD2* so I can duplicate it. Also just noticed the original question on the best way to trigger a fire. That would be to send Special Key#1. This is only for fire. To trigger a CO2 I think your approach is correct so I will be testing this.

https://www.alarmdecoder.com/wiki/index.php/Protocol#Special%20Keys

Best
SM

@f34rdotcom
Copy link
Contributor

Ok I just tested and yes I also get Trouble.. I will keep digging.

@f34rdotcom
Copy link
Contributor

Ugg. Ok this is a documentation error. The valid values are 0: CLOSE, 1: Trouble, 2: OPEN

I will leave this open until I get the wiki page fixed.

Best
SM

@f34rdotcom
Copy link
Contributor

@mcnutter1
Copy link
Author

I'll try tomorrow morning, but FWIW, when I had the zone type to 3, the 0/1 worked fine to fault the zone and restore it like a regular door contact so maybe the extra "2" only comes into play on more complicated sensors like Smoke / CO / Etc... ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants