Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[nrf fromlist] tests: bluetooth: tester: refactor CSIP btp command #1971

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Frodevan
Copy link
Contributor

Note: The corresponding changes from this are already in our auto-pts repo, so this should fix a discrepancy...

Refactor CSIP btp commands by removing the 'count' parameter from set_coordinator_lock and set_coordinator_release functions. If we want to support lock/release procedure on subset of set members in the future, 'count' param doesn't indicate a specific set member. Instead, introduce 'address_count' and 'addr' array params, although their usage is not yet implemented.

Upstream PR: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#71059

@Frodevan Frodevan changed the title [nrf fromlist] bluetooth: tester: refactor CSIP btp command [nrf fromlist] tests: bluetooth: tester: refactor CSIP btp command Aug 26, 2024
@Frodevan Frodevan force-pushed the OCT-3106-fix-csip branch 5 times, most recently from 7c9de8a to b0d3d57 Compare August 26, 2024 11:40
@Frodevan Frodevan force-pushed the OCT-3106-fix-csip branch 3 times, most recently from 246abb8 to 9d1ed25 Compare August 29, 2024 07:38
Refactor CSIP btp commands by removing the 'count' parameter from
set_coordinator_lock and set_coordinator_release functions.
If we want to support lock/release procedure on subset of set members
in the future, 'count' param doesn't indicate a specific set member.
Instead, introduce 'address_count' and 'addr' array params, although their
usage is not yet implemented.

Upstream PR: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#71059

Signed-off-by: Piotr Narajowski <[email protected]>
@Frodevan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebasing manifest ci branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants