-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Orka allocated storage Alert #3257
Comments
Maybe this is related to #3240 (comment), but not sure at all.. 🤔 |
As agreed in #3299, I asked the support team about the available space and how the snapshots are stored. Ticket reference: SERVICE-157767 |
Current status: No technical answer yet from support ( |
Current Status:
@nodejs/build I am not sure why the allocated space had increased as I removed several VMs for #3087. If we pass the 100% allocation they might add additional charges, but seems like the Orka cluster will keep working. But I am not 100% confident. |
Current Status:
Next Steps
|
Nice! I wonder if we could have only one image per macos version? All instances of the same version could be based on the same image. |
Yes @targos, I think is a good idea to keep a base image with SSH Keys as the base image (prior to Ansible step). That way we can save a lot of space. I noticed also that some of the backups are not restoring well, at least for 10.15 (#3218 (comment)). If we want to reduce the VMs size from 80G to 40G we will need to purge the working VMs and generate a new ones, so we can use the new slim-images for it. So, this will help us to have enough space for 12.x machines (#3240 (comment)) Known limitations:
|
Making the images smaller is risky as weve struggled in the past with macos bloating quite suddenly and the nodejs repo itself bloating when built. Also did removing the |
@AshCripps seems like the images are part of the pool based on latest response in Ticket SERVICE-160622
Do you think that 60G VM size will work? Or it is better to keep 80G? |
IIRC the vms on nearform were around that size and they were always a problem but things might be differenet now. The only real issue is if a machine gets selected for a node-commit-test and then like a debug build and a citgm build rapidly eating up the disk space. |
After the discussion in #3362, we agreed to simplify the number of images as follows: 1 image per MacOS version and usage (e.g., So, after a basic calculation (6 images at 90GB each = 540GB), we will be more than okay with the pool size. Also, this confirms that backing up each running VM machine will be impossible given the pool size. Next steps
|
Current status VMs: Images deleted
Future steps
I will close the issue as the alert has been resolved and there are no actionable items pending. |
We just received a notification in this ticket via email.
There is more relevant information in the thread as there are multiple automatic messages in the ticket:
I can't find the reference to
MS-A-51-PSB01
or10.86.32.60
in the macstadium inventory. 🤔The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: