You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This can cause processes with open file descriptors to continue reading the old inode. Of particular interest are Docker mounts.
I have been trying to leverage docker-gen to render config files, and I then share those config files to other contains, ideally mounting just the rendered config files as them directly into the receiving containers filesystem as :ro. (Trying to be secure 🤷♂️)
But due to the above behavior, the receiving container never sees the new rendered config -- it continues reading the old inode and therefore old data.
This isn't necessarily a bug with docker-gen -- I fixed it for now by not mounting the file directly, but rather mounting the file's directory which alleviates the issue -- but truncating the existing inode and writing directly would have helped me out recently. Thanks for considering this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It appears that
docker-gen
creates a new temporary file that is then moved to[dest]
, based at least on differing inodes.Consider the following REPL:
(The inode changes from
32639413
to32639416
.)This can cause processes with open file descriptors to continue reading the old inode. Of particular interest are Docker mounts.
I have been trying to leverage
docker-gen
to render config files, and I then share those config files to other contains, ideally mounting just the rendered config files as them directly into the receiving containers filesystem as:ro
. (Trying to be secure 🤷♂️)But due to the above behavior, the receiving container never sees the new rendered config -- it continues reading the old inode and therefore old data.
This isn't necessarily a bug with
docker-gen
-- I fixed it for now by not mounting the file directly, but rather mounting the file's directory which alleviates the issue -- but truncating the existing inode and writing directly would have helped me out recently. Thanks for considering this issue.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: