Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Renaming function for study/assay #212

Open
micwij opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request] Renaming function for study/assay #212

micwij opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature

Comments

@micwij
Copy link

micwij commented Aug 15, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I currently see no direct way for renaming a study or an assay. Maybe this is a somewhat rarer case, but I could see several scenarios, where you would want to change the study or assay identifier. Here are some examples

  • Your collaborator/supervisor/reviewer wants you to repeat a study and you would now like to number both of them or add a year tag.
  • You want your collaborator to rename an assay to fit the naming scheme of your platform (e.g. https://nfdi4plants.org/nfdi4plants.knowledgebase/docs/guides/ARC-enablingPlatforms.html)
  • The preliminary names of a mutant/newly discovered species/software tool after which you named a study/assay is changed during the course of the project

Describe the solution you'd like
I could imagine a function like arc s rename that works similar to the other ISA Metadata functions where you can assign a new identifier. Alternatively maybe this functionality could be incorporated into arc s update /arc s edit

Describe alternatives you've considered
The current alternative I see for studies is to create a new study with the desired id and moving all associated assays with arc a move. However you still need to move the isa.study.xlsx and other files manually. The same goes for assays.

Additional context
Sorry if there is a simple alternative, that I am missing.

@HLWeil
Copy link
Member

HLWeil commented Aug 18, 2023

Hey @micwij,

that's definitely a needed feature is on the to-do list.

@omaus omaus added the Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature label Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants