ARC for project management #15
Brilator
started this conversation in
Comments and Suggestions
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
This contradicts l. 267
I would suggest to change to: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi everyone,
Dominik here, CEPLAS, HHU Düsseldorf.
What I envision for ARC in the future, is that it captures virtually anything from starting a project idea (pre-data) to publishing it and beyond (data re-use).
Typical feedback I get from the user community
Basically I want my answer to always be: ARC.
I know, the points are basically the same old story from any talk about FAIRification. And although technically it's all there, at the moment some of the info is unstructured (i.e. "additional payload"), especially considering the standard not-git-affine lab biologist, who might even wish for visible snapshots of the iteration happening in isa.investigation.xlsx as the project develops.
Most of our colleagues are very centered around their current habits and environment (e.g. tools like ELNs) and hard to transition to something new (especially if a well established functionality is missing). Let's give them project management and integration into daily lab routines.
Surely nothing for now, but maybe for future versions.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions