Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a couple of bottlenecks in the pipeline #159

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

nvnieuwk
Copy link

This PR fixes a couple of bottlenecks I noticed in this pipeline

@nf-core-bot
Copy link
Member

Warning

Newer version of the nf-core template is available.

Your pipeline is using an old version of the nf-core template: 3.0.2.
Please update your pipeline to the latest version.

For more documentation on how to update your pipeline, please see the nf-core documentation and Synchronisation documentation.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2025

nf-core pipelines lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 4035a18

+| ✅ 225 tests passed       |+
!| ❗   4 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add bibliographic entries to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Only uncomment below if logic in toolCitationText/toolBibliographyText has been filled!
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in base.config: Check the defaults for all processes

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 3.0.2
  • Run at 2025-01-15 08:23:26

workflows/rnavar/main.nf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nvnieuwk and others added 2 commits January 15, 2025 09:19
@nvnieuwk nvnieuwk merged commit bfd3665 into nf-core:dev Jan 15, 2025
11 checks passed
@nvnieuwk nvnieuwk deleted the fix/bottlenecks branch January 15, 2025 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants