-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error with rmats.py when running with multiple contrasts: <filename>.bam not found in .rmats files #85
Comments
Fixed in #87 Please try with the latest dev branch, and let us know if it solved your issue. |
Hi, thanks a lot for looking into this issue. I tested again now with the latest dev:
Unfortunately, the outcome was the same as the one reported above.
This is what the work dir looks like. Please let me know if I can do any further digging in there, in case it helps with identifying the issue.
I'm guessing that these are the
And these are the entries containing
|
Looks like the |
Can you post your sample and contrast sheet? I'll make a dummy copy for further testing. |
The sample and contrast sheet are linked in the first post, above. |
Can you pull the code from #88 and run with your data? I've refactored the code and tested it on some dummy data which mimics the experimental design of your data, but would be good to have you test before I merge the PR. |
Thanks again for working on this. I tested again with the
|
There seems to be a problem with the directory naming convention. MISO expects directories ending with
As for the last error:
This one is strange, because that file is definitely present there, at least it is at this moment in time.
|
The same MISO issue also happened now when running a previous test with only one contrast, which previously worked fine. |
Closing this issue as the rMATS bug has been fixed. Please open a new issue to discuss the MISO bug. |
Description of the bug
Running the pipeline with multiple contrasts in the contrast sheet results in multiple errors as mentioned in the filename. The pipeline runs fine with only one contrast at a time. As such, it's possible that this issue might be related to a separate report, which was focused on SUPPA: #71
Relevant input files, as well as the full log, are attached below.
Command used and terminal output
Relevant files
custom.config.txt
params.yml.txt
contrasts-rnasplice.csv.txt
sample-sheet-rnasplice.csv.txt
nextflow.log.txt
System information
Nextflow 23.04.2
Latest Dev version of the rnasplice pipeline
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: