You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'd like to suggest that the Mail app should display message/rfc822 mime parts.
Those parts often are forwarded emails, or emails that were encapsulated by mailing list managers to produce valid DMARC headers. More often than not I (and I guess many others) want to actually read those messages, without having to download and open them in another app.
Displaying the message/rfc822 mime part should not replace other content parts of the email but it should be displayed additionally.
Describe the solution you'd like
The Mail app should show an rendering of the mime part that includes the typical headers (From, To, Subject, etc.) and displayable content parts just as it would if the mime part would be a standalone email.
Bonus points for allowing to extend the list of headers, but I would not consider that a necessary feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'd like to suggest that the Mail app should display
message/rfc822
mime parts.Those parts often are forwarded emails, or emails that were encapsulated by mailing list managers to produce valid DMARC headers. More often than not I (and I guess many others) want to actually read those messages, without having to download and open them in another app.
Displaying the
message/rfc822
mime part should not replace other content parts of the email but it should be displayed additionally.Describe the solution you'd like
The Mail app should show an rendering of the mime part that includes the typical headers (
From
,To
,Subject
, etc.) and displayable content parts just as it would if the mime part would be a standalone email.Bonus points for allowing to extend the list of headers, but I would not consider that a necessary feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: