You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some people struggle to understand why Nevalang exist because we already have Go/Erlang/Elixir/Gleam/etc. The reason is always the same - they ignore some (always different ones) aspects of the language, such as:
Implicit Parallelism
Hybrid/Visual Programming
Static Typing
Machine Code compilation
Pure Dataflow
And so on and so forth
Looks like it's not enough to list these features, we need to create documents specifically describing differences between Neva and other languages. E.g. "Neva vs Go", "Neva vs Elixir", "Neva vs Gleam", etc.
P.S. - I'm not saying those people are stupid. It's just that documentation quality is too poor. We need to have perfect docs if we wanna deliver our message
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some people struggle to understand why Nevalang exist because we already have Go/Erlang/Elixir/Gleam/etc. The reason is always the same - they ignore some (always different ones) aspects of the language, such as:
Looks like it's not enough to list these features, we need to create documents specifically describing differences between Neva and other languages. E.g. "Neva vs Go", "Neva vs Elixir", "Neva vs Gleam", etc.
P.S. - I'm not saying those people are stupid. It's just that documentation quality is too poor. We need to have perfect docs if we wanna deliver our message
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: