Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write an output extension for pywb replay (assuming it's possible) to fix the relative <time> problem. #8

Open
Lisias opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Lisias
Copy link
Contributor

Lisias commented Aug 1, 2024

Since I decided to bite the bullet and customize pywb for my objectives...

On Forum, fellow Kerbonaut RKunze suggesting mangling the <time> to get rid of the relatives timestamps I complained here.

Given the premises of the project, absolutely no derivatives, I can't mangle the bitstream as I need to write in the WARC file exactly what I received from Forum.

But this doesn't means that the idea can't be useful! This issue is to remember me to try something.

@Lisias Lisias self-assigned this Aug 1, 2024
@Lisias Lisias added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 1, 2024
@Lisias Lisias changed the title Write an pywb replay output extension (assuming it's possible) to fix the relative <time> problem. Write an output extension for pywb replay (assuming it's possible) to fix the relative <time> problem. Aug 13, 2024
@net-lisias-ksp net-lisias-ksp deleted a comment from ColdJ-KSP Oct 19, 2024
@Lisias
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lisias commented Oct 19, 2024

Removing comments just for house keeping. Refer to this discussion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant