Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADDON] - External Secrets Operator #10

Open
julianxhokaxhiu opened this issue Jan 16, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #96
Open

[ADDON] - External Secrets Operator #10

julianxhokaxhiu opened this issue Jan 16, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #96
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request on-hold No work is required for now. Might be picked up in the future, or not.

Comments

@julianxhokaxhiu
Copy link
Member

julianxhokaxhiu commented Jan 16, 2023

Issue Type

Enhancement

Description

The Context:
When deploying apps on the cluster there is a need to manage secrets, without the risk of exposing them through Environment Variables or managing them by hand and having rotation problems in the future. Having some tooling that helps do this automatically and in a safe and secure way, would be better.

The Solution:
In order to provide cross-cloud compatibility, the External Secrets Operator addon could be added, which would enable their usage not only consuming the relative Cloud Provider secret managers but also third-party ones like Hashicop Vault.

The Alternatives:
One alternative to the External Secrets Operator that has been considered is the Secrets Store CSI Driver, although the current list of providers doesn't seem to match the one from the External Secrets Operator.

@julianxhokaxhiu julianxhokaxhiu added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 16, 2023
@amanvr amanvr self-assigned this Mar 7, 2023
@amanvr amanvr linked a pull request Mar 8, 2023 that will close this issue
@amanvr
Copy link

amanvr commented Mar 9, 2023

This is being put on hold till local development for addons is fixed

@amanvr amanvr added the on-hold No work is required for now. Might be picked up in the future, or not. label Mar 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request on-hold No work is required for now. Might be picked up in the future, or not.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants