Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to compare with quicksilver/ndhotkeyevent #3

Open
nathanday opened this issue Aug 30, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Need to compare with quicksilver/ndhotkeyevent #3

nathanday opened this issue Aug 30, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@nathanday
Copy link
Owner

quicksilver have made some changes, need to see how many of these are work added to ndhotkeyevent

@tiennou
Copy link
Contributor

tiennou commented Nov 30, 2013

(I was about to open an issue about something else, I'll chime in here first)

In theory #2 contains every change I've made to account our needs (that is, QS Hotkey Triggers system allows triggers to be entered with any of the standard modifiers (e.g. ⌘, ⌥, ⌃, ⇧), plus the MacBook Pro's Fn keys, as well as supporting "silent" keys like ⇥, ↩ and ⎋. As a matter of fact, the pull request where I did that still isn't merged, so please note that it's not yet tested on non-Latin layouts (I can confirm it works for my French azerty keyboard though, but we were more interested in the Chinese ones). I think I'll do a build of that pull request and distribute it through our user group/update system.

@pjrobertson @skurfer What do you think of testing that out as either a "private build", or a developer preview ?

Also note that I'm about to file another issue ;-).

@skurfer
Copy link

skurfer commented Dec 2, 2013

What do you think of testing that out as either a "private build", or a developer preview ?

I think we’re still pretty far from being ready for a developer preview, but a private build would be good. Just make sure the build number is 4007 and tell them to manually replace 1.1.3. That way, they’ll still get the next release when it becomes official.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants