The fundamental region of FCC system #764
Unanswered
M-Eddahbi
asked this question in
Ask Anything
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Hi Mohamed, to me this appears fine. Why do you think that this is wrong? Ralf. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
This is fine. I think you are overlooking a minus on top of the 00-1,
hidden under the big symbol? Then it is [00-1], [0-1-1], [1-1-1] , as in
the figure
tor. 11. feb. 2021, 19:34 skrev Eddahbi, Mohamed OuLahcen <
[email protected]>:
… Hi Ralf,
Thank you for the answer.
The notation [1-1-1] is wrong. The correct one is [-111] (See the
stereographic projection in view)
[image: Proyeccion1]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/75380911/107681907-f91d9f00-6c9f-11eb-9436-57848e5c7e14.jpg>
treographic projection of an FCC system reference).
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#764 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACXIUNLUDPQMJNOD5VKNRI3S6QPLZANCNFSM4XNLCMTQ>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
He Ralf,
I projected samples axes into the fundamental region of an FCC system and I get the figure in view.
The upper corner of the triangle must be the conjugate plane (-111) (or direction) instead of (1-1-1).
Is it true?
Thank you in advance
Mohamed
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions