Use LBM for network restore (client-side map-saving)

[OgelGames]

https://github.com/mt-mods/travelnet/blob/696548f6d30064db79d4cc161e5b66fa3a0d4711/restore_network_via_abm.lua

[BuckarooBanzay]

There is a config option (disabled by default) that includes that file:

travelnet/init.lua

Lines 1110 to 1113 in 696548f

	if( travelnet.enable_abm ) then
	-- restore travelnet data when players pass by broken networks
	dofile(travelnet.path.."/restore_network_via_abm.lua");
	end

Funny thing: it has a typo: enable_abm ~= abm_enabled 🤦

travelnet/config.lua

Line 19 in 696548f

travelnet.abm_enabled = false;

[S-S-X]

also abm != lbm, it would be better to change that abm to actually be lbm. no reason to do it every 20 sec for every travelnet in active areas.

[BuckarooBanzay]

also abm != lbm, it would be better to change that abm to actually be lbm. no reason to do it every 20 sec for every travelnet in active areas.

it is not enabled by default, i think the use-case would be to restore the network after a client-side map-save

[wsor4035]

does this really need to be a a/lbm? couldnt you just handle this update in the right click rather than adding more overhead?

[BuckarooBanzay]

does this really need to be a a/lbm? couldnt you just handle this update in the right click rather than adding more overhead?

That would work too i guess

[S-S-X]

does this really need to be a a/lbm? couldnt you just handle this update in the right click rather than adding more overhead?

That would work too i guess

I think that wont exactly work. Or more like it already works but UX results are not same.
Reason for this is that you actually have to go through all travelnet boxes in network multiple times as only already visited will be added to network and because of this player needs to visit and update travelnet boxes multiple times.

Actually this might also be reason why it is ABM instead of LBM.

[wsor4035]

in theory d8c0c9d should have solved the data loss issue