You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
Rather than passing around the original direct link to a list all over the place, it might be better to generate shortened "tokenized" links. It's a bit overkill, but you could revoke access to individual links instead of killing the list.
This could play into #75 because you wouldnt want to directly any user who has seen a list to that list.
Instead, it'd be more like user -> links -> lists. You'd probably have to combine that with any lists that user directly created. So you basically end up with created_lists and collab_lists. Since collab lists could be deleted or the link to a collab list could be revoked/deleted, that list would no longer appear for said user.
If they got their handles on a different collab link that was active, they'd have access again.
This whole thing might be overkill, but just some thoughts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Rather than passing around the original direct link to a list all over the place, it might be better to generate shortened "tokenized" links. It's a bit overkill, but you could revoke access to individual links instead of killing the list.
This could play into #75 because you wouldnt want to directly any user who has seen a list to that list.
Instead, it'd be more like
user -> links -> lists
. You'd probably have to combine that with any lists that user directly created. So you basically end up withcreated_lists
andcollab_lists
. Since collab lists could be deleted or the link to a collab list could be revoked/deleted, that list would no longer appear for said user.If they got their handles on a different collab link that was active, they'd have access again.
This whole thing might be overkill, but just some thoughts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: