You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my IPCC analyses I had to remove many simulations (model-variable-, model-scenario-ensemble-, or other combinations). Even for the cleaned 'new-generation' repos, mesmer has to remove some of the simulations. For IPCC I did that in the data processing loop but I think it would be better done in the 'find the simulations' part (i.e. in filefinder). So we should add an ExcludeFilter (better names always welcome). We'd need to think about the way metadata for the excluded simulations is passed.
For IPCC I have a function which identifies matching metadata:
In my IPCC analyses I had to remove many simulations (model-variable-, model-scenario-ensemble-, or other combinations). Even for the cleaned 'new-generation' repos, mesmer has to remove some of the simulations. For IPCC I did that in the data processing loop but I think it would be better done in the 'find the simulations' part (i.e. in filefinder). So we should add an
ExcludeFilter
(better names always welcome). We'd need to think about the way metadata for the excluded simulations is passed.For IPCC I have a function which identifies matching metadata:
https://github.com/IPCC-WG1/Chapter-11/blob/d1a3a99f242a568fb4cefc36a038c888a90b9d37/code/fixes/_fixes_common.py#L47
But maybe could also use pandas machinery, e.g.
isin()
:FYI @veni-vidi-vici-dormivi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: