You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since we are adding mixing rules to the foyer XML files, do we also want to add fixed bonds and angles variable/info to XML files, designed tail corrections, and LJ/could short-range cutoffs?
For example, some of the TraPPE FF linear molecules have are semi-flexible (fixed bonds, but not fixed angles). While some of the rings are either totally fixed or totally flexible, depending on who fits the FFs.
This is not an urgent task, but it may help minimize user differences in some cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In our development call today, we concluded that making the fixed bonds and angles as a bool at the bond and angle level makes the most sense. This means adding an additional attribute to the force field XML files, "fixed_bond"=True/False, "fixed_angle"=True/False (or similar ... ), at the same level as the bond and angle K-constants, bond lengths, and angle degrees.
A summary of the question or discussion topic.
Since we are adding mixing rules to the foyer XML files, do we also want to add fixed bonds and angles variable/info to XML files, designed tail corrections, and LJ/could short-range cutoffs?
For example, some of the TraPPE FF linear molecules have are semi-flexible (fixed bonds, but not fixed angles). While some of the rings are either totally fixed or totally flexible, depending on who fits the FFs.
This is not an urgent task, but it may help minimize user differences in some cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: