Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add converse.js #18

Closed
Perflyst opened this issue Jan 1, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

Add converse.js #18

Perflyst opened this issue Jan 1, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@Perflyst
Copy link
Contributor

Perflyst commented Jan 1, 2020

Add converse.js as webclient recommendation

@licaon-kter
Copy link
Contributor

licaon-kter commented Jan 1, 2020

If the server supports it? Else it's not something that you can get...

@Perflyst
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perflyst commented Jan 2, 2020

We could link https://conversejs.org/fullscreen.html or https://inverse.chat/ where you can login with any account on any server.

@licaon-kter
Copy link
Contributor

licaon-kter commented Jan 2, 2020

And JcBrand pinkie promises to not record credentials... I don't find it nice...not as nice as a standalone client.

@Perflyst
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perflyst commented Jan 2, 2020

You are right, then lets wait for Look out for an Electron based version of Converse coming in the following months. https://conversejs.org/docs/html/features.html

@sjehuda
Copy link
Contributor

sjehuda commented May 17, 2022

Add converse.js as webclient recommendation

Both, client and desktop.
Desktop, with all the others.
Webclient, for an immediate access

@ge0rg
Copy link
Collaborator

ge0rg commented May 29, 2022

Fixed in #32

@sjehuda
Copy link
Contributor

sjehuda commented Mar 10, 2023

Add converse.js as webclient recommendation

@Perflyst please explain why do (or did) you want to do this.
In what way would it be useful?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants