Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add oidc claim debugging #82

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

add oidc claim debugging #82

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mnbf9rca
Copy link
Owner

@mnbf9rca mnbf9rca commented Sep 12, 2024

Summary by Sourcery

Integrate OIDC claim debugging into the deployment workflow by adding a step that uses the actions-oidc-debugger.

CI:

  • Add OIDC claim debugging step to the deployment workflow using the actions-oidc-debugger.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request adds OIDC claim debugging functionality to the GitHub Actions workflow for deploying to PyPI. It introduces a new step that uses the actions-oidc-debugger action to debug OIDC claims before the package deployment process.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added OIDC claim debugging step to the deployment workflow
  • Checkout the actions-oidc-debugger repository
  • Use the actions-oidc-debugger action in a new step
  • Removed commented-out code for version extraction
.github/workflows/deploy_to_pypi.yml

Tips
  • Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
  • You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
    • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
    • Change the review language;
  • You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mnbf9rca - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider using a more secure method for authentication when checking out the debugger action, or ensure the personal access token has minimal necessary permissions.
  • The OIDC claim debugging step could be made optional by using a conditional based on an input parameter, allowing for more efficient regular deployments.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ jobs:
environment:
name: ${{ inputs.target-environment }}
steps:
- name: Checkout actions-oidc-debugger
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚨 suggestion (security): Consider documenting the use of the OIDC debugger and its security implications.

While adding debugging capabilities can be helpful, it's important to document why this OIDC debugger is necessary and consider any potential security risks. Consider adding a comment explaining its purpose and ensure that it's only used in non-production environments. Also, review the information being logged to prevent accidental exposure of sensitive data. On a positive note, good job on removing the commented-out code for version extraction, which helps keep the codebase clean.

@mnbf9rca mnbf9rca closed this Sep 12, 2024
@mnbf9rca mnbf9rca deleted the chore/log_oidc_claims branch September 12, 2024 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant