You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Also, APL uses RTL flow. So maybe supporting "<-" wouldn't be such a bad idea..?
Combining the two in the same chain would be chaotic, for sure. But using one for (LTR) node composition and the other one (RTL) for applying it and getting some result, might be okay. Example:
BB:{In -> Transformation -> Out}
result <- BB <- in
Looks weird at the first glance, but in a strange way it makes total sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
R uses left arrow as an assignment. E.g.:
Also, APL uses RTL flow. So maybe supporting "<-" wouldn't be such a bad idea..?
Combining the two in the same chain would be chaotic, for sure. But using one for (LTR) node composition and the other one (RTL) for applying it and getting some result, might be okay. Example:
Looks weird at the first glance, but in a strange way it makes total sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: