-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use fuse-sshfs from a proper repo for minishift-centos-iso #109
Comments
@LalatenduMohanty Do we already took any step for CentOS PaaS SIG side (at least a request to have minishift tag)? I am in favor of PaaS sig instead COPR because COPR is not something which contain official packages. |
@praveenkumar The first step we are doing in PaaS SIG is to package Minishift RPM then the ISO will follow. I will request for a tag asap. |
@praveenkumar @LalatenduMohanty - Is this anything we can do right away? Otherwise I suggest we move this into 1.1.0 and release 1.0.0. |
@hferentschik I would suggest to move it for 1.1.0 release because right now we don't have much time to do needful. |
+1 That was my thinking as well. Let's do that, and then cut 1.0.0 of this repo. I think there are no actual changes since the last rc release, so it is more of a formality. |
+1 |
@praveenkumar @LalatenduMohanty what is the state here. Is there another repo we could get it from? Or should we keep deferring it? |
|
Yes, we can try using the EPEL repository. |
We should not use
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/x86_64/adb/
as it is not not maintained, the workaround will be to use a COPR repo or the new Minishift repo in CentOS PaaS SIG (when it is ready).[1] https://github.com/minishift/minishift-centos-iso/pull/108/files
[2] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: