-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ores Rarity #2664
Comments
Ore densities have not actually decreased, the ore regions have just become deeper due to #2107
👎 The new depths are: Ore. Highest. Density increase |
It isn't too hard to dig deep down if you have the right strategy. |
On Minecraft, Diamonds and Redstones can be found much less deep that in Minetest. |
@AFCMS I believe there aren't deep tunnels and caverns in the underground. There are quite holes in MInetest's underground which ease finding ores. Most servers and players use transportation mods (lifts, teleporters, carts) to get down really fast. Without mods I can understand it might be frustrating to not find as many ores, but this ore placement is a compromise that was done under consideration of often used mining practices. |
What Minecraft does is irrelevant =) We used to have many complaints that mining was too easy, and it was far too easy, especially once we added tunnels that travel down a long distance, so a change was made for non-mgv6 mapgens. Mgv6 still has the old depths. For the mesecons issue you should contact the mod maintainer and ask them to consider making the crafting recipes drop more conductors. |
Huh i just realised something =D A Minecraft world has an underground only 64 nodes deep, so the ores are inevitably much shallower. So it is meaningless to compare ore depths to MT. |
It would be cool to have possibility to play the two game styles
|
Closing due to #2710 |
Some ores are very rare
-diamonds
-mese block
-mese ore
It is not easy today to make large mesecons circuit in survival...
Is it possible to can set in the world generation panel ores global rarity ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: