-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Copy pathsa_evolution.htm
803 lines (676 loc) · 41.3 KB
/
sa_evolution.htm
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">
<meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<title>The Theory of Evolution</title>
<META NAME="description" CONTENT="Explanation of matter and physic laws by standing waves.">
<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="physics, matter, standing waves, gravity, Relativity, Lorentz transformation, electron, atom, light, Doppler effect, fields, electricity, magnetism">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#E1E1E1">
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><a href="matter.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_agg.gif" width="159" height="31"></a><a href="sa_postulates.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_ag.gif" width="162" height="31"></a><a href="sa_errors.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_ad.gif" width="133" height="31"></a><a href="sa_conclusion.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_add.gif" width="146" height="31"></a></font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Charles Darwin's</font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="6">THEORY
OF EVOLUTION</font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">revisited.</font></p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>IN THE BEGINNING OF
TIMES, THERE WAS NOTHING BUT THE AETHER</b></font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Nowadays
most scientists are quite sure that aether does not exist.
Surprisingly, none of them checked this carefully. They just learned
it from their professor.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">The
point is: you are not entitled to think that the aether is useless. You
simply cannot prove it. If you think
so, you surely are unaware of the standing waves amazing properties. And you
did not carefully study Lorentz's version of Relativity, which finally
proves to be true.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">This
web site postulates that matter is made of "moving standing waves" and that all forces are
waves. Those waves need an aether. In addition, Relativity was discovered by Lorentz and
Poincaré in 1904. Not by Albert Einstein. Their original version, especially Lorentz's, admits the existence
of the aether. Lorentz never discarded the existence of aether until his death
in 1928.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Unfortunately, Lorentz
was unaware (until
he was very old, in 1927) of de Broglie's
"matter waves". This would have helped him around 1895 in
order to explain the cause of his transformation. Standing waves actually undergo the Lorentz transformation. It is
that simple. Any average intelligent person should firstly doubt
Einstein's ridiculous ideas. Physics should be an exact science. Not a
religion.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">So,
let's postulate that matter is made of waves and that those waves need a
carrier: aether. Assuming this, you may imagine any hypothesis about
its origin. In accordance with the Causality Principle, any effect has a
Cause. And because our material universe is made purely out of aether,
this Cause cannot be material any more. So it should be un-material.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">You
may explain the World's origin the way you prefer. You may also give
this most honest and sincere answer:</p>
</font>
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p align="center"> "I don't know".</p>
</font>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">And so, in my opinion, one should postulate that an aether filled with
waves which contain a lot of energy had to exist in the beginning of times. </font>
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Then the continuation was
foreseeable:
</p>
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4"> </font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<ol>
<li>
<p align="left">Because the aether is finite and elastic, a "Big Bang"
followed by an expansion occurred.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">This explosion produced strong and abundant
longitudinal traveling waves.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">The waves created a lot of electrons and positrons.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Electrons and positrons were attracted together and
created a lot of quarks.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some quarks joined together and generated neutrons
with additional gluonic fields.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some neutrons received a positron in their centre
and they became protons.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Protons attracted electrons and produced hydrogen
atoms.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Hydrogen atoms were attracted by gravity and
produced stars.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Those stars joined hydrogen atoms and neutrons and
produced deuterium and tritium.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Then deuterium and tritium atoms joined together and produced
helium.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">The stars containing less hydrogen ended their life
and exploded as supernovae.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">While exploding, supernovae produced more complicated
atoms.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Those atoms joined and produced a 2nd generation of stars
and planets, the Sun and the Earth.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Atoms became more complex arrays of
molecules.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">On Earth, complex molecules became living cells
capable of duplicating themselves.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some cells joined together in the sea and generated more
complex organisms.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Those organisms had to adapt themselves and evolved according to Darwin.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Evolved organisms became animals living at the expense of plants or other animals.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some animals became aquatic vertebrates.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some aquatic vertebrates became fishes.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some fishes used their fins in order to
survive out of the water and became amphibians.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some amphibians did not return to water any more
and became reptilians.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some reptilians transformed their scales into hairs
and became mammals.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some mammals evolved in the trees and became
primates.</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Some mammal primates developed their brain and became
homo sapiens.</li>
</ol>
<p align="center">
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4"><img border="0" src="images/ligne02.gif" width="559" height="10"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1 - THE CREATION OF
THE AETHER</b></font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Matter
standing waves and force waves simply need an aether. Let's postulate
that it can transmit regular longitudinal traveling waves without any
loss.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">In all good faith
and sincerity, one must admit that there is no material explanation for
aether. Its origin is postulated to be un-material.
</p>
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>2 - THE BIG BANG </b>(also
revisited).</font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">The aether
cannot be fully rigid because it can transmit waves. It must be elastic.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">On the
other hand, at least in mathematics, the infinite does not exist. So the
aether cannot be infinite, either. Its elasticity does not necessarily
leads to its expansion, but all our observations indicate that our
universe is really expanding.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">So let's
postulate that in the beginning of times the aether suddenly begun to
exist. Then there was a huge explosion which generated powerful and
abundant waves.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">This model does not
involve any temperature, albeit aether granules could locally be capable of
static vibrations.
</font>
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
This new
Big Bang theory indicates that an expanding aether could allow galaxies
traveling at speeds greater than the speed of light as compared to those
in the center.</font>
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
Such galaxies could be so distant and so fast that they
would be invisible. They could nevertheless be practically at rest
inside their own portion of aether. This new approach eliminates any
reference to the speed of light in order to establish their age and
their distance. Otherwise, we know that our universe should be about 15
billions of years old.</font>
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
Finally,
our universe could be much more ancient.
</p>
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>3 - THE ELECTRON
CREATION</b></font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">The first
step after the aether creation must have been the electron creation. One
can show that according to Huygen's Principle, many plane waves traveling
inside aether could add themselves and produce an electron. Because the
whole universe is made purely of electrons, and assuming that an aether
filled with waves exists, our universe then must exist. It is just a question of
time.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Without any existing
electron, this situation is not likely to happen, but it must happen. One
chance out of billions of billions, because the wavelength and the phase must
match during a very short period of time.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">However, with billions of
existing electrons, whose wavelength is almost the same, this situation becomes much
more probable. There is still one chance out of billions. But because the time
is almost infinite in such an universe, this situation is not just probable:
it is a certainty.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">The diagram below shows
that many <b><i>plane</i></b> waves can generate a concentric wave
system, in other words an electron.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Here there
is only one plane, and this leads to a half wavelength central core.
However, more waves coming from many directions would produce a full
wavelength core instead.
</p>
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<div align="center">
<center>
<table border="4" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="6">
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center"><img border="0" src="images/duplication.gif" width="300" height="300"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The electron creation.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Just a few waves can
produce a spherical standing wave system. </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Then this system
completes itself, and it can be stable because it is amplified by aether waves.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Those waves
must coincide in the centre for at least several wavelengths. Then the
standing wave system is amplified by aether waves and it remains stable
forever. New electrons can be more easily generated while there are many
existing electrons around, because they produce waves whose frequency
and wavelength is almost constant. Without any existing electrons around, the
chances are much smaller.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">In the
beginning, the available time was nearly infinite. Who knows how many
"years" were needed in order to make billions of electrons? In
all cases, their creation was unavoidable.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">This
indicates that as soon as an aether filled with waves exists, our
universe must exist. This is only a matter of time, or a matter of
chance.
</p>
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>4 - THE QUARKS
CREATION</b></font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">A
quark is simply made of two electrons (or two positrons) very close
together. However, especially on the axis joining them, their standing
waves are adding themselves in a very special way. One obtains a set of
plane standing waves whose phase is different in the center, canceling
the normal electron negative charge. This produces a very strong
"gluonic field" which can attract any other particle, and whose mass is much greater
than that of one electron. This electron pair
with its gluonic field then looks very much like a totally different
particle.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">In the
beginning, the electrons' phase was randomly distributed. There
was no specific electrons or positrons. As soon as
a reasonable number of particles were present inside
aether, those whose phase was opposite were certainly attracted together and
they collided. We
know that such a collision produces quarks, but most scientists think
that the electron and the positron annihilate. Actually, it is much more
logical to suppose that those two particles still exist inside the
quarks, but that the strong gluonic field is hiding them.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Quarks are
highly unstable. However, two electrons and two positrons can join
together and form a two-quarks meson, which is more stable. Then
another quark can join and produce a neutron.
</p>
<p align="left"><b>Quark pairs.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">There could
be another process. We know that a collision between an electron and a
positron produces two quarks, which are not identical. This could be
explained by another way of producing electrons.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Most
likely, one electron and one positron traveling towards each other will
not truly hit each other. Their wavelength is so small that their
central core cannot coincide. They will rather follow a rotating
elliptical trajectory much similar to that of binary pulsars. This is
called "positronium", also a highly unstable particle.
However, as soon as those electrons and positrons come very close
together the first time, they must change their direction in a very
severe manner, the way a comet does while circumnavigating the Sun.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">This severe
U-turn supposes that the standing waves near the core of those
particles will be transformed. The farthest ones will not; they
will simply focus where the particles were supposed to be before
colliding. The electron core is very small but actually its standing
waves fill a huge volume much larger then that of an atom.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">So, beyond
a certain threshold, very fast electrons or positrons can duplicate
themselves while colliding. They will join themselves and finally make
two quarks instead of just one:
</p>
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" src="images/quark16_a.jpg" width="536" height="155"></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The farthest standing
waves cannot follow a severely deviated electron.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Those waves will focus
where they were supposed to and create a new electron.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" src="images/quark16a.jpg" width="455" height="222"></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The collision involves
one electron and one positron.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Finally there are four
particles, making one quark and one anti-quark.</font></p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Those
particle can even deviate at least one more time allowing them to produce a
second quark pair. Gluonic fields should occasionally join two quarks
together and produce a more stable unit: a meson. This meson could
contain three or four electrons or positrons, and the system phase could
be different from that of normal electrons or positrons.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">One
can suppose that a meson containing three electrons at the vertices of a
triangle should be stable because the three gluonic fields are
especially efficient in such a position. One can also imagine four
electrons at the vertices of a tetrahedron, or of a plane square. Here,
there are six gluonic fields, whose mass should be important. Then a
third quark or a second meson could transform them into a neutron. Three
quarks could also produce a neutron in just one step, but this situation
is not likely to happen.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Then
a positron can join the center of a neutron and produce a proton.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Finally,
the proton can capture an electron, making them a hydrogen atom. As
shown above, billions and billions of hydrogen atoms will produce stars,
and the evolutionary process will continue.</font>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><img border="0" src="images/ligne02.gif" width="559" height="10"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4"><b>DARWIN'S THEORY IS </b></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="4"><b>INCOMPLETE</b></font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Because
there is a lot of information indicating that life evolved on
Earth for at least 4 billions years, any true scientist (that is, fully in
possession of his intelligence and objectivity) should admit that
Charles Darwin was right. For instance, one can follow the horse's
evolution since its "eohippus" ancestors, about 50 millions years ago.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">This
is not debatable any more. Surprisingly it is still debated nevertheless,
mostly by people who try by any means to make their religion fit in a
more convenient picture.
</p>
<p align="left"><b>The evolution theory should also include matter.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> On the other hand Darwin only spoke about the
"evolution of species", i.e. plants and animals.
</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">I am
of the opinion that Evolution Theory should also include matter, because
the whole universe evolved as well from its very beginning. About 15
billions years, probably more. Our
knowledge also evolved: Darwin was unaware of this.
</p>
<p align="left"><b>Natural selection does not fully explain evolution.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
Darwin was also unaware of DNA, chromosomes, and genetic mechanisms. Nowadays,
it is a well known fact that if they were transmitted unchanged during
many centuries, they very slowly but surely lead to fully static and
uniform species for a given environment.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
So natural selection does not fully explain evolution. The main cause is
accidental and occasional mutations inside DNA. Evolution is controlled
by chance, if chance does exist. Darwin emphasized natural selection,
which now appears to be just one aspect of the mechanism.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">This
is important because chance also controlled the evolution of the whole
universe from its very beginning.</p>
<p align="left"><b>Determinism.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
And if chance does not exist, your freedom is purely illusion. In this case,
tomorrow already exists in the energy of an infinity of waves and in the
motion of an infinity of electrons. Then you can do nothing
about it: tomorrow will occur, unrelentingly.</p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p align="center"><b>LET'S THINK</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
According to Darwin, we are mammal primate hominids, in other words,
just animals. Our most recent discoveries about our ancestors, up to six
million years, indicate that mankind, gorillas and chimpanzees have common ancestors.
Darwin did predict that. They lived about 15 millions years ago.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Those
discoveries also indicate that about 10 million years ago, our
definitely human ancestors were already biped. They had a small
brain, not bigger than that of chimpanzees. However, they had already
begun to perform an amazing phenomenon: <b><i>to think</i></b>. </p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Knowing
this, any human capable of thinking should conclude that just one man
and one woman simply could not give birth to the whole of mankind. Let's
face it: Adam and Eve, from the Bible, never existed. During all those
years, thousands of humans were simultaneously living in Africa. They evolved
there in much
the same way as all other animals, but they evolved faster and better.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Darwin
was aware of that, but he did not dare to write it. So today one must
affirm it clearly.</p>
<p align="left"><b>We think with our brain.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Let's
lastly say something that very few courageous people will admit: we are
thinking with our brain. This is also a fairly recent discovery, for it
occurred after Darwin's epoch.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">This
means that at the very instant of our death, logically, we stop
thinking.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">It
is about time that everyone realizes this. Ancient Roman people used to
explain that any dying person had to "expire" in order to let
his soul escape from his body. They called this last breath "anima",
which simply means air, and the soul name soon followed as
"animus". However, they were not aware that air was material.
They simply noticed that the invisible and apparently un-material wind
could cause a strange effect on their skin, and that this last air pulse
could very well explain the also apparently un-material nature of their thoughts.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">I
do not say here that human beings have no soul. I simply note that those two
apparently metaphysical reasons which have been invoked in order to
explain the soul's existence have been clearly identified as being <b><i>physic</i></b>
ones. So they belong to physics.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">If
this does not satisfy your personal metaphysical thoughts, I cannot help.
I just want to discuss physics. So please avoid annoying me about your
emotional feelings and just discuss physics, because it is an exact
science. Physics is the science of truth and reality.</p>
<p align="left"><b>We are animals.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">We
are nothing but animals. Fortunately, we are animals who can think. This is a major advantage, but this still does not exclude us from the animal kingdom. Many readers
told me that they see themselves "on a higher level", but they can't explain why. Let's face it: we are simply animals.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
This observation should redirect us towards a better knowledge of our behavior, for example by comparing it with that of gorillas and
chimpanzees, our cousins. Psychology is not an ideal: it is a science.
Our behavior as a science follows the same rules as in physics. It
should need observations and experiments, and it should avoid being
distorted by our thirst for absolute.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> One must
firstly distinguish what we are from what we should be. Clearly, we
cannot see the difference any more. Our behavior was imperatively inculcated
into us under the terms of often debatable principles. We
cannot establish laws and habits which are compatible with our true
nature any more. The result is that too many of us are frustrated, badly adapted, and unhappy.</p>
<p align="left"><b>We are evolving backwards.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Darwin
did not point out that natural selection is not working properly any more
because we can and do interfere. We do not accept its essential role.
We can cure a lot of severe diseases which would have prevented many
people from giving birth to more people suffering from the same diseases. We
do not inform those people that their health problems are likely to be transferred
to their children. This leads to a deterioration of mankind's general
health.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> Mankind
is a fantastic achievement, proving that evolution normally works
towards perfection. Our illogical behavior will cancel this, though.
Mankind is likely to degenerate and suffer for years, and finally
disappear.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Let's
make it clear: a conscious, advised and responsible selection is
required. Otherwise, we will simply terminate our trek. Nobody will ever
be capable of repairing a human being inside all of his genes. No medicine, no
genetic treatment can help. </p>
<p align="left"><b>Our Earth is overpopulated.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Nobody
seems to worry about the formidable population increase nowadays. Once
again, this is a severe disturbance of the <b><i>normal species
evolution:</i></b></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpop">http://www.ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpop</a></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/popclockw">http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/popclockw</a></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Even a stabilization will not be enough.
Our planet needs an equitable and reasonable <b><i>depopulation</i></b>.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">While waiting, we
are confronted with devastating pollution, generalized deforestation and the disappearance of a
tremendous number of vegetal and animal species.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">The damage that overpopulation
has already caused is enormous and
irreversible. There is a point of no return. We must intervene radically right
now.</p>
<p align="left"><b>Evolution in the future.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Some
day, because evolution normally works towards perfection, more animals
and even plants may also be capable of thinking. Such events may happen
in billions of years from now, or sooner, here or anywhere in the
universe, but they will happen.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">Students
should avoid constantly repeating other's ideas. They should doubt
them, in accordance with Descartes' "doubt is the origin of
wisdom". Actually, most of the 6.5 billion people on this planet are
very often wrong, and this leads to more errors, and finally to
decadence. Many people also intentionally spread errors, for political or
financial reasons. Many people even lie to their own children, which is
definitely the most despicable thing on Earth. Let's make it clear:
unless he admits it, anybody who is in doubt does not say the truth, and
so he lies.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
A lot of schools, high schools and Universities in North America simply
avoid speaking of Darwin in order to "preserve" their
student's religion. Some of them even pretend that Darwin was
wrong. I myself had to suffer this shame. I had been recruited as a
boarder student by a very special college among all of Quebec's seventh
grade best scholars. I had to perform the IQ test (they used to
eliminate all candidates below 140) and finally, I took the ancient
"classical course" in a highly erudite environment.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">In
spite of that, <b><i>I was not told about Darwin</i></b>. And what is
more, I had to undergo a severe brainwashing. Fortunately, I realized that
all this was wrong. I decided to escape at the age of 19, but I
nevertheless had to struggle all my life in order to repair my ideas. I am
still angry about it. Very angry.</p>
<p align="left"><b>Think about it.</b></p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">The
goal is to improve our future. Because we are animals who can think, and
because this is our major advantage, the correct tool is thinking. We
must repair our wrong ideas. We must also look for new ideas, and we
must check whether they are wrong or not.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">I
had to think all my life.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">It
was worth the effort because I discovered that matter is made of
waves.</p>
<p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-INDENT: 35.4pt; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
And naturally, I can prove it.</p>
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><a href="matter.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_agg.gif" width="159" height="31"></a><a href="sa_postulates.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_ag.gif" width="162" height="31"></a><a href="sa_errors.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_ad.gif" width="133" height="31"></a><a href="sa_conclusion.htm"><img border="0" src="images/fleche_add.gif" width="146" height="31"></a></font></p>
<font face="Times New Roman" size="4">
<p align="center"><span class="white">
| <a href="matter.htm">01</a> | <a href="sa_electron.htm">02</a> | <a href="sa_plane.htm">03</a>
| <a href="sa_spherical.htm">04</a> | <a href="sa_Doppler.htm">05</a> | <a href="sa_aether.htm">06</a>
| <a href="sa_Michelson.htm">07</a> | <a href="sa_Lorentz.htm">08</a> | <a href="sa_scanner.htm">09</a>
| <a href="sa_relativity.htm">10</a> | <a href="sa_relativity2.htm">11</a>
|
</span><a href="sa_phaseshift.htm">12</a><span class="white"> | </span><a href="sa_mechanics.htm">13</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_electrostatic.htm">14</a><span class="white"> | </span><a href="sa_nuclear.htm">15</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_active.htm">16</a><span class="white"> |</span></p>
<p align="center"><span class="white">| </span><a href="sa_kinetic.htm">17</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_fields.htm">18</a><span class="white"> | </span><a href="sa_dynamics.htm">19</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_magnetic.htm">20</a><span class="white"> | </span><a href="sa_gravity.htm">21</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_light.htm">22</a><span class="white"> | <a href="sa_quarks.htm">23</a>
| </span><a href="sa_protons.htm">24</a><span class="white"> | </span><a href="sa_atoms.htm">25</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_chemistry.htm">26</a><span class="white"> | </span><a href="sa_wavetheory.htm">27</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_postulates.htm">28</a><span class="white"> | </span>You are here.<span class="white">
| <a href="sa_errors.htm">30</a> | <a href="sa_experiences.htm">31</a> |
</span><a href="sa_Huygens.htm">32</a><span class="white">
| </span><a href="sa_conclusion.htm">33</a><span class="white"> |</span></p>
</font>
<p align="center"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1000">
<tr>
<td width="100%"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4"><center>
<p align="left"></center>Gabriel LaFreniere</p>
<p align="left">Bois-des-Filion in Québec.</p>
<p align="left">Email <a href="notice.htm">Please
read this notice.</a></p>
<p align="left">On the Internet since September 2002. Last update
December 3, 2009.</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<!-- text below generated by server. PLEASE REMOVE --><!-- Counter/Statistics data collection code --><script language="JavaScript" src="http://l.yimg.com/d/lib/smb/js/hosting/cp/js_source/whv2_001.js"></script><script language="javascript">geovisit();</script><noscript><img src="http://visit.webhosting.yahoo.com/visit.gif?us1333638200" alt="setstats" border="0" width="1" height="1"></noscript>