Different alignment rates for MiXCR analyze and MiXCR align #1795
Answered
by
mizraelson
Januaryyiyue
asked this question in
Q&A
-
Hi, I previously used MiXCR4.1.2 align, assemble, etc. separately and get an alignment log like this:
When I repeat the analysis with MiXCR analyze, my log file looks like this:
The alignment rates are significantly different, but the resulting clones are almost the same. Is there a reason why this is the case? If e.g., a previous alignment rate of 50% would be considered acceptable, what percentage should I expect from the new alignment rate? Thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
mizraelson
Oct 8, 2024
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hi, can you share the exact commands? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The difference is because you are using
-OallowPartialAlignments=true
, which preserves (marks as successfully aligned) reads that do not fully cover the CDR3 region. During the assembly step, such reads will not generate any clones due to the absence of the complete clonal sequence. This is particularly relevant for capTCR, where there are many reads resulting from the enrichment of the V and J genes that did not recombine. These reads will not contain the CDR3 region but will still be partially aligned. The analyze command filters out such reads on the align step.