You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current description of token regexes uses PCRE regexes, but these are very hard to read when they get large.
This may also be a good opportunity to move to actual regular expressions. That would lose some non-regular features (capture groups, back-references, look-around, etc.) but gain some other ones (intersection, difference, guaranteed linear time parsing).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current description of token regexes uses PCRE regexes, but these are very hard to read when they get large.
This may also be a good opportunity to move to actual regular expressions. That would lose some non-regular features (capture groups, back-references, look-around, etc.) but gain some other ones (intersection, difference, guaranteed linear time parsing).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: