-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
05-relationship-centered.Rmd
255 lines (132 loc) · 8.86 KB
/
05-relationship-centered.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
# Relationship Centered
## Affection Exchange Theory
## Transnational Scholarship
## Resilience Communication Theories
[@Buzzanell_2010]
- Human resilience is "the ability to "bounce back" or reintegrate after difficult life experiences"
- Resilience is not possessed by individual but by discourse, interaction, and processes:
- crafting normalcy
- affirming identity anchors:
- identity anchor is "a relatively enduring cluster of identity discourses upon which individuals and their familial, collegial, and/or community members rely when explaining who they are for themselves and in relation to each other."
- maintaining and using communication networks
- Social capital is important in time of need
- putting alternative logics to work
- downplaying negative feelings while foregrounding positive emotions
- [@Richardson_2002] defines resilience as "the process of reintegrating from disruptions in life"
- requires "trigger event"
<br>
[@AFIFI_2016]
- Theory of resilience and relational load (TRRL) in the context of social
- based on theory of
- emotional capital
- adaptive calibration model, allostatic load, investment model, family systems theory, affectionate exchange theory, broaden and build theory
- Assumptions
- people want to feel validated and secure, based on sociometer hypothesis, intergroup theories, social identity theory, evolutionary theories (e.g., exchange theory).
- stress is natural and necessary (either good or bad).
- good stress = positive perception of stressors
- bad stress = distress = negative perception of stressors
- body and mind work together to cope with stress
- body has a natural diurnal rhythm
- relationship have homeostasis that is "continually being calibrated in response to stress and the communication of stress."
- Propositions:
- "Validating communicative maintenance behaviors and actions over time build positive emotional reserves. Emotional reserves reflect the accumulation of investments (i.e., maintenance) and discrepancies in investments"
- Communal orientation & discrepancies influence communication maintenance behaviors/discrepancies, and vice versa
- Communal orientation, emotional reserves, discrepancies in the communal orientation influence how one perceives stressors, which later influence their investment in the relationship
- communal orientation and emotional reserves, discrepancies int eh communal orientation influence threat and security-based appraisals and communication pattern
- Similar constructs to communal orientation are cognitive interdependence, couple identity, communal coping
- self-control could be depleted
- continued depletion of resources and increased stress increase relational load
- short-term depletion and relation load have short-term and long-term health consequences respectively.
- "Security-based appraisals and communication patterns facilitate resilience, the potential to thrive, and short-term and long-term health"
- Communicative maintenance strategies can be learned
- Resilience is "the ability to adapt positively when confronted with adversity or stress" [@2003_3713]
- positive *relationship maintenance* can serve as resilience in close relationships, via
- nonverbal behaviors
- perceptions
Picture from **Personal Relationships, Volume: 23, Issue: 4, Pages: 663-683, First published: 26 October 2016, DOI: (10.1111/pere.12159)**
<br>
[@Buzzanell_2018]
Resilience include:
- Individual/relational resilience: social relationship can increase adaptive ability to adversity. To increase one's resilience
- giving and receiving affection
- exchanging person-centered messages
- being present
- family resilience
- parent-child (dyadic) can foster resilience
- organizational resilience
- 5 tensional processes
- community resilience
- bouncing forward = interactional process that helps individuals to adapt successfully to changing circumstances
- national resilience
- resilience is defined by Hamilton Bean as a "central trope", "shared social phenomenon" that solidify "shared feelings of resoluteness."
<br>
[@Kam_2018]
- How undocumented youth cope with stress at the family level
- Resilience is "the process by which individuals exposed to adversity exhibit positive adaptation in spite of this adversity." It is a general pattern or process than a trait or quality.
- To cope with stress, youths use strategies:
- psychological suppression
- distraction/diversion
- reframing
- normalizing
- The individual as an asset
- The family as a resource
- Stress come from
- unable to go places, unable to attend college, employment, help family financially, affordable health care
- fear of detainment/deportation
<br>
[@First_2020]
- Covid-19 exposure directly influence stress, and indirectly influence stress and depress through media use and interpersonal communication.
## Communication Privacy Management Theory
- CPM is under a boarder context as compared to only disclosure. It's the dialectical tension of private information between revealing and concealing under a rule management system.
- Guiding maxims:
- Assumption maxims:
(1) public-private dialectical assumptions: dialectical nature of revealing and concealing
(2) privacy management assumptions:
- We are entitled to our private information
- people should control the flow of private information
- managing private information is not absolute
(3) boundary metaphor assumptions
- Axiomatic maxims:
(1) Conceptualizing private information ownership: one can be authorized, or unauthorized co-owners of information.
(2) conceptualizing private information control: privacy rules are applied based
(1) core criteria: culture, gender, privacy orientations
(2) catalyst: privacy rules adapt to changes.
(3) conceptualizing private information turbulence: gossip breaks privacy
- Interaction maxims:
(1) shared privacy boundaries: there is a boundary around the shared information.
(2) coordinating privacy boundaries: co-own, co-manage, 3 operations:
(1) privacy boundary linkages: alliances between a discloser and recipients
(2) private information co-ownership rights: privileges and expected responsibility for co-owners of private information.
(3) privacy boundary permeability: the amount of openness within a privacy boundary. managed boundary in
(1) disproportionate way
(2) intersected way
(3) Unified way
(3) ramifications of privacy boundary turbulence
- Application:
- [@Petronio_2007]: translational aspect
- [@Bute_2017]: Orgasm and alcohol on communication after sexual activity.\
- [@Brummett_2014]: interracial partners disclose relational information to social network members. They both experience power struggles while managing private and relational information.
- [@Denes_2014]: miscarriages are bound by societal-level expectations about how they should be talked in interpersonal communication.
## Relational Turbulence Theory
- Relationship progresses in two ways
- Qualitative change perspective: sudden tranformational change
- Quantitative change perspective: incremental shifts
- causes of relational turbulence during times of transition
- relational uncertainty ,from emotion-in-relationships model, refers to "degree of confidence (or lack of confidence) that individuals have in their judgments about the nature of their relationship." [@Baxter_2008, .pp521]
- Consists of
- Self uncertainty
- Partner uncertainty
- Relationship uncertainty
- Interference from partners: from emotion-in-relationships model, consists of
- Inference from partners
- Facilitation from partners
- Under relational turbulence, people use both avoidant and aggressive messages [@Baxter_2008, .pp523]. It changes the message processing and message production mechanisms.
- This theory can be applied to a broad range of contexts from couples, parents, military personnel, etc.
- Applications:
- [@Solomon_2016]
- [@Theiss_2013]
- [@Tian_2020]
- [@Harvey_Knowles_2015]
[](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hcre.12091)
[@Solomon_2016, pp.509]